Discussion about this post

User's avatar
A House Grows in Brooklyn's avatar

Fascinating. It strikes me that what you call "parameters" in architecture corresponds to genre in literature. When novelists or poets opt to write within this or that genre, they are opting to conform to conventions without which the very idea of genre cannot exist. Want to compose an epic poem? At one time, your meter had to be dactylic hexameter. No choice in the matter. The implications for creativity and originality are far-reaching. One implication, it seems to me, has to do with audience. Only an audience knowledgeable about those generic conventions can assess the work, i.e., can identify its aesthetic value. To a neophyte, Vergil's poetry looks like mere pastiche or even plagiarism of Homer. Only someone "in on" what's really at work will be able to identify the manifold variations, apparently subtle but in fact cumulatively immense. Probably that's why we have so few geniuses: it's the rare person who can both produce a work of genius and teach the audience to recognize it.

Valence's avatar

Wow

No posts

Ready for more?